Over the last few years I have, sadly, witnessed many small,
expertly informed and passionately dedicated charities - and other not-for-profit
organisations - being squeezed into oblivion on the funding front because (it seems) the funds are mostly given to larger, more influential NGO's.
There are still funders and philanthropists out there who prefer to give their monies to grass root organisations, but they seem to be fewer and farther between these days. This concerns me because it means we are losing diversity….in more ways than one!
There are still funders and philanthropists out there who prefer to give their monies to grass root organisations, but they seem to be fewer and farther between these days. This concerns me because it means we are losing diversity….in more ways than one!
I'm not suggesting for one moment that we don't need the
larger charities. I understand how important it is that they
continue to receive the funds and donations needed to deliver their vitally
important messages and work…..especially because they reach such a large audience and, in many cases, are able to influence policy decisions at government level. HOWEVER, having run a small charity myself, and having
been seriously tempted to shift the focus of that charity's aims when applying for
funds - in order to tap in to any available funding just to survive - I have
become increasingly uncomfortable with the way the system (especially in the
case of corporate donations and sponsorship) favours the larger and better known charities.
One of my biggest concerns is when national &
international charities take up causes that their trustees, management and staff
appear to know little about. For instance, I have seen members and volunteers of large
charities being interviewed on BBC news about bee decline and have been dismayed to hear them leave out enormously important information, or even worse, deliver mis-information. When this happens, I fear, with the greatest of respect for their aims, that they are in danger of doing more harm than good.
In the mean time, the media are mostly oblivious of smaller charities who have been working for years, sometimes decades on raising awareness of this, and other issues….charities who really know their bees from their bees and who have (in some cases) now folded because the large funders and corporate sponsors prefer to nail their flags to larger masts.
In the mean time, the media are mostly oblivious of smaller charities who have been working for years, sometimes decades on raising awareness of this, and other issues….charities who really know their bees from their bees and who have (in some cases) now folded because the large funders and corporate sponsors prefer to nail their flags to larger masts.
Of course we need as many voices as possible to speak out for the myriad environmental, ecological and humanitarian issues facing us today….and if the
national press are only interested in promoting the charitable aims of the
larger charities then so be it, but I really hope we don't end up in a situation
where the voices being heard come solely from charities/organisations so large that they are
begin to resemble corporations….. whilst smaller, but equally knowledgeable voices get squeezed out
completely.
This is a big subject to tackle in a little blog post, and I haven't fully worked out where I'm going with my own thoughts yet, but I'd be extremely interested to know what others think?
Thank you,
N.B. I still donate to, support and promote the work of many large charities myself, so please don't read what I have just written as
an attack on said organisations. It isn’t. I just don't like seeing the
amazingly dedicated smaller charities being squeezed out of the arena and wanted to air this concern to see what others think. Hopefully I will discover
that I've got it all wrong and that more small grass root organisations are
actually healthy and thriving than are hitting brick walls and folding.